In the late 1990s, the Council of Writing Program Administrators
(CWPA) developed and endorsed the “WPA Outcomes Statement for
First-Year Composition” (WPA OS), which has been widely used to
shape curricula, pedagogy, and assessment in colleges and universities
in the United States, as well as institutions in other countries (Thomas).
Building on the foundation of the WPA OS, CWPA spent several years
collaborating with the National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE)
and the National Writing Project (NWP) to develop the Framework for
Success in Postsecondary Writing, which was published in 2011. Peggy
O’Neill, Linda Adler-Kassner, Cathy Fleischer, and Anne-Marie Hall,
who served on the joint task force, note that “CWPA, NCTE, and NWP
agreed that a joint task force that drew on the experiences of writing
teachers from all levels would be the best way for writing teachers to
think through and ultimately articulate the expectation for students
entering college-credit-bearing writing courses” (521). As the task force
members crafted the document, they liberally proliferated drafts among
focus groups at conferences, soliciting suggestions for revisions and
establishing disciplinary consensus. Those conversations were lively
and engaging, involving hundreds of faculty who offered constructive
feedback on how to make the Framework meet the needs of students
enrolled in writing courses. This collaborative process and the people
who participated modeled the Framework’s eight habits of mind: curiosity,
openness, engagement, responsibility, creativity, persistence, flexibil
النتائج (
العربية) 1:
[نسخ]نسخ!
In the late 1990s, the Council of Writing Program Administrators(CWPA) developed and endorsed the “WPA Outcomes Statement forFirst-Year Composition” (WPA OS), which has been widely used toshape curricula, pedagogy, and assessment in colleges and universitiesin the United States, as well as institutions in other countries (Thomas).Building on the foundation of the WPA OS, CWPA spent several yearscollaborating with the National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE)and the National Writing Project (NWP) to develop the Framework forSuccess in Postsecondary Writing, which was published in 2011. PeggyO’Neill, Linda Adler-Kassner, Cathy Fleischer, and Anne-Marie Hall,who served on the joint task force, note that “CWPA, NCTE, and NWPagreed that a joint task force that drew on the experiences of writingteachers from all levels would be the best way for writing teachers tothink through and ultimately articulate the expectation for studentsentering college-credit-bearing writing courses” (521). As the task forcemembers crafted the document, they liberally proliferated drafts amongfocus groups at conferences, soliciting suggestions for revisions andestablishing disciplinary consensus. Those conversations were livelyand engaging, involving hundreds of faculty who offered constructivefeedback on how to make the Framework meet the needs of studentsenrolled in writing courses. This collaborative process and the peopleوعلى غرار الذين شاركوا العادات في الإطار الثمانية للعقل: الفضول،الانفتاح، والمشاركة، والمسؤولية، الإبداع، استمرار، flexibil
يجري ترجمتها، يرجى الانتظار ..
