النتائج (
العربية) 1:
[نسخ]نسخ!
They cite empirical evidence that common law origin is significantly correlated with indices measuring how much a country’s current rules protect the rights of minority shareholders and creditors during reorganizations of firms. These indices are themselves highly correlated with measures of the development of equity markets and the availability and flexibility of financing for firms. They argue that historical difference in legal tradition led to differences in protection of investors, property and contractual rights and hence to differences in the willingness of savers to invest. They offer little empirical support for Rubin’s view that the more important influence of legal origins is on protection of property rights from the state, perhaps because this is harder to measure.
يجري ترجمتها، يرجى الانتظار ..
