The language used in 2854 has, until very recently, been reproduced with remarkably little change, and Y think it rather unlikely that Parliament in 1854 was directing its mind to garnishees served within the jurisdiction but owing debts to the judgment debtor abroad. Since nn order attaching a foreign chose in action has been made in any reported ~ case, there can have been no pressing need for the Rules Committee to clarify any suggested ambiguity in the rules.