The next authority is I ones v Lipman [1962] 1 WLR repented of the bargain and, before completion, sold and transferred it to the second defendant, Alamed Ltd. a company whose control he appears to have acquired a few' days after the plaintiffs had served turn with a notice to complete. The plaintiffs application for summary judgment for specific performance against both defendants (but, we infer] for any claim for damages for breach of contract against Mr Lipman alone: see the facts as summarised at page 834) came before Russell J. He noted that it was admitted that Mr Lipman’s strategy in selling on the land had been carried through solely for the purpose of defeating the plaintiffs’ rights