It provides extensive guidance, with principles organised according to a defined hierarchY 9 , on how to assess whether or not voting rights confer control over an investee and on instances when voting rights do not clearly indicate whether the reporting entity ought to consolidate the prospective subsidiary. It also includes a number of anti-avoidance mechanisms not found in its predecessors, such as provisions for the consolidation of ‘ring-fenced’ assets (IASB, 2011a). The result is a highly detailed consolidation standard, complemented by an ‘application guidance’ and integrated examples that makes IFRS 10 considerably lengthier than IAS 27 and SIC 12 and far less dependent on the application of professional judgement (PricewaterhouseCoopers, 2012; D'anjou, 2013).