[edit]
Based on the above model, it is hypothesized that a positive problem orientation lead to rational problem-solving skills.[7] A rational problem-solving style is defined as sensible, thoughtful, and methodical application of effective problem-solving skills.[7][8] This, in turn, is most likely to result in positive outcomes and an exit from the problem solving process for this particular instance.[7] When a negative outcome occurs, a person with rational problem solving skills is more likely to begin the cycle of problem-solving again. This time with the intent to find a more appropriate solution or to redefine the problem. On the other hand, a negative problem solving orientation is likely to lead towards impulsive-careless or avoidant problem-solving styles. An impulsive-careless style is defined as narrowed, rash, thoughtless, speedy, and incomplete attempts at problem solving.[7][8] An avoidance style to problem-solving is characterized by inaction, procrastination, and attempts to shift responsibility to others. Both of these styles are hypothesized to lead towards negative outcomes more often in the Social Problem-Solving Process.[7] When negative outcomes occur, a person with an impulsive-careless or avoidant skill set is more likely to give up.