Factors deliberate distortions, ie raising or lowering scores / performance value. This can be done by the assessor because there are certain motifs, for example, want to maintain a good relationship with a colleague, a supervisor wants to avoid a confrontation with subordinates, or there may be involvement of subjective feelings of likes and dislikes of the assessor. It is already a form of injustice that would have a negative impact and potential to be a major problem when done continuously. The manager should be able to provide value to the objective, since managers are people who are deemed able to perform such a system. Aside from that position is the belief that should not be wasted, because the employees are not robbed equality subjective assessments.
While the distortion factor that inadvertently due to performance assessment information obtained by observations that are stored in the memory without a note and then recalled to complete a performance assessment, it is a fairly complex task, so the forgetting factor could happen. A systematic record keeping is very doubtful actualization and beliefs. This could potentially lead to the subjectivity of assessment for the procedure of assessment is only done by memory. Truly, people have high levels of selective memory, which will remember certain events that have the impression and 'unusual'. But human memory sometimes can only bring good things fine, or even things worse. So the possibility of doing things that are subjective in greater ratings. If this is not corrected, then injustice will continue. Awareness of the need for managers to record a discipline to ensure that subjectivity can be suppressed.
النتائج (
العربية) 1:
[نسخ]نسخ!
العوامل التشويهات المتعمدة، أي رفع أو خفض درجات/قيمة الأداء. يمكن أن يتم ذلك بالمستشار لأن هناك بعض الزخارف، على سبيل المثال، ترغب في الحفاظ على علاقات جيدة مع زميل، مشرف يريد تجنب مواجهة مع المرؤوسين، أو قد تكون هناك مشاركة مشاعر ذاتية من يحب ويكره من قام به. أنها بالفعل شكلاً من أشكال الظلم، مما سيكون له أثر سلبي، ويمكن أن تكون مشكلة كبيرة عند القيام به بشكل مستمر. ينبغي أن يكون المدير قادراً على تقديم قيمة الهدف، إذ أن المديرين هم الذين تعتبر قادرة على أداء هذا نظام. وبصرف النظر عن أن موقف هو الاعتقاد بأن ينبغي إلا تضيع، للموظفين ليست المساواة سرقة التقييمات الذاتية.While the distortion factor that inadvertently due to performance assessment information obtained by observations that are stored in the memory without a note and then recalled to complete a performance assessment, it is a fairly complex task, so the forgetting factor could happen. A systematic record keeping is very doubtful actualization and beliefs. This could potentially lead to the subjectivity of assessment for the procedure of assessment is only done by memory. Truly, people have high levels of selective memory, which will remember certain events that have the impression and 'unusual'. But human memory sometimes can only bring good things fine, or even things worse. So the possibility of doing things that are subjective in greater ratings. If this is not corrected, then injustice will continue. Awareness of the need for managers to record a discipline to ensure that subjectivity can be suppressed.
يجري ترجمتها، يرجى الانتظار ..
