I do not recognise the characterisation of our pleading. Leaving that to one side, changes to figures are no concern, but that's not what we are talking about here. I would not be making these points on the agenda if this caused us no prejudice. That is the starting point. So you will go away in due course and look at the response but we know statements like: "The statement of case contends that we are liable for delay caused by nominated subcontractors.