BFI' have made clear that they would not apply for a stay and obviously ABCI do not do so. The second question which was not much debated before me would be whether the Court would only have the power to stay if an application was being made as per s. 5(2j(f) which is expressly referred to in s. 5(5) or whether if proceedings were contemplated in some other jurisdiction which could affect the decision on any of the matters (a) to (e), in those circumstances also [here would be a power to stay. This latter point does not I think really arise in this case because I do not understand BFI' to be seeking a stay as opposed to the setting aside of service, but it adds emphasis to the point that I have already made on forum conveniens, that in my view, on a natural reading of s.5(5) there is no power in the Court even to stay save where an application has been made as contemplated by s. 5(2)(fl.